I like to drink, go around, and do whatever I want

Well, that's what Bill O'Reilly says about Libertarians in one of his segments with a Russian woman that knows the meaning behind words.
Bill, you can have your protection, I just want my freedom.

p.s. I may want to do whatever I want, but just because I want to doesn't mean that I will.

Patriotism (Nationalism) above all else

I heard Billo say something like "What about Obama's kids hearing Rev. Wright's rants against America."
Oh yes, let's worry more about God Damn America and chickens than racial junk. Apparently a parent's first duty is to teach patriotism *salutes*
Yep, America is totally becoming a religion.

Alf!

Alf is going to be on Billo's show. Might be the most worthwhile thing he aired.
Or maybe I just really like Alf...

Sup with Billo and Hannity?

Yesterday he showed child pornography. Censored, yes, but keep this in mind-whenever he reports on legal pornography, it's very lightly pixellated. This was blurred, heavier than the legal stuff, but still pretty bad. Anyway, is this distribution? Could a pedo defend himself if it's censored? I really hope the axe finally comes down on this jerk. Not literally of course.
Anyway, he said today that New York is a very liberal state. Yet if New York City broke away and became it's own state, New York State would be a red state. Not quite very liberal....
Earlier today Hannity went on about how Halloween is a liberal tool or something. Yep, "they teach our kids to beg for things for free!" Well, I'm paraphrasing, but that's pretty much dead on. Way to take something innocent (and nice) and pervert it, Jacobin!

Ron Paul's a pinhead?

Bill O'Reilly thought so. I guess he had some sort of marathon going on, and I happened to catch the last part of the 6AM one. Ron Paul said he wouldn't go on O'Reilly again because he didn't give him a chance to answer.
O'Reilly said he doesn't want a history lesson. Is it possible to answer a question about Iran without a history lesson? No, it solidifies a "no". O'Reilly is just a browbeater, like Chris Matthews used to be.
O'Reilly really needs a Zell Miller.

O'Reilly the Heretic, part II

He's talking about the cross dressers receiving Our Lord's Body again, and yet he still manages to dig himself further in a hole. He mentioned secular progressives want "unfettered abortion". Is he implying that it's alright in some cases?
He still never apologized for his implied support of birth control.
O'Reilly did make a pretty good point though. He said that the Church didn't condemn them. What O'Reilly doesn't know is the majority of the USCCB is almost schismatic. Emphasis on almost. There's a few good men, and quite a number of them are well intentioned and have been tricked by the bad ones. This is why we have to pray for them.
Will the Pope say anything about it? It wouldn't surprise me if he didn't. He knows how it is over there, he knows that it's not Catholicism anymore.

Bill O'Reilly the Heretic

The question is if he's a material or formal heretic. I missed the factor (because I was listening to Santana) but here's his talking points memo:

Talking Points Memo & Top Story
Gay activists mock the church--in church
A shocking story out of San Francisco--this time, two gay men dressed as nuns are given communion in a San Fran Catholic church.

Thank Goodness he's reporting it, but I have a bone to pick with him. He implied that if people have to have sex before marriage, they should wear a condom. That's right, he'd advocating birth control, contrary to the Catholic Church's teachings under the pain of excommunication. I understand his intention, and it's a sad side effect from the cult of life that has been set up in the post-Vatican II Church. Sure, abortions would be down if condoms were used more often, but ipso facto excommunications rise. Chances are, they'll receive our Lord's Body while outside of the Church, and sacrilege would rise. I hope Bill stops espousing Heresy and stops making a mockery of his Catholic faith like Shawn Hannity is.
He had a chance to apologize for advocating birth control. In the end, he's no better than the men that he reported on. The same sacrilege is happening. I understand that people sin and falter, I have plenty of experience. It's not possible to justify ideological sin like this. Is he addicted to saying condoms are good? If that's even possible, he's still a sick man and doesn't belong on TV.
A note to detractors, I'm not claiming I'm better than these men. However, I challenge you to show me something I wrote that's in support of birth control.